| Requirement & Regulatory Citation | Compliance Status | Compliance Comments |
| Did document indicate that the shipment contained oil?. [49 CFR Part 130.11(a)] | | |
| Was document readily available indicating that the shipment contained oil?. [49 CFR Part 130.11(b)] | | |
| Was there a release of oil from a package?. [49 CFR Part 130.21] | | |
| Did the oil transporter have a current basic discharge plan?. [49 CFR Part 130.31(a)] | | |
| Did the carrier implement a response plan?. [49 CFR Part 130.33] | | |
| Was a person, who offered or accepted a hazardous material, registered with the Federal DOT or did they offer or accept an improperly prepared package?. [49 CFR Part 171.2(e)] | | |
| Was transporter registered with the Federal DOT or did they properly handle or transport hazardous materials?. [49 CFR Part 171.2(b)] | | |
| Was container improperly represented that it met the requirements of 49 C.F.R.?. [49 CFR Part 171.2(f)(1)] | | |
| Did a person misrepresent that a hazardous material was present in a package, container or motor vehicle?. [49 CFR Part 171.2(f)(2)] | | |
| Did anyone tamper with a marking, label, placard, or description on a document?. [49 CFR Part 171.2(g)(1)] | | |
| Did anyone tamper with a package, container, or motor vehicle used to trasport hazardous materials?. [49 CFR Part 171.2(g)(2)] | | |
| Did the carrier mark motor vehicle in accordance with 390.21 or 1058.2?. [49 CFR Part 171.3(b)(1)] | | |
| Did the carrier give immediate notice of incident by telephone to Federal DOT?. [49 CFR Part 171.15] | | |
| Did the carrier submit a written report to Federal DOT within 30 days of incident?. [49 CFR Part 171.16(a)] | | |
| Did the carrier retain copy of incident report for 2 years?. [49 CFR Part 171.16(b)] | | |
| Did the shipper describe the hazardous material on the shipping paper?. [49 CFR Part 172.200(a)] | | |
| Did the shipper use a proper description on the shipping paper?. [49 CFR Part 172.201(a)(1-4)] | | |
| Did the shipper properly number continuation pages and did the first page specify the total number of pages?. [49 CFR Part 172.201(c)] | | |
| Did the shipper include as part of the shipping description the proper shipping name, hazard class or division, ID#, packing group and total quantity?. [49 CFR Part 172.202(a)(1-5)] | | |
| Did the shipper show the shipping description in the proper sequence?. [49 CFR Part 172.202(b)] | | |
| Did the shipper list the total quantity before or after, or both before and after the basic description?. [49 CFR Part 172.202(c)] | | |
| Did the shipper offer or carrier transport a material that is not a hazardous material with a hazard class or ID# in the shipping description?. [49 CFR Part 172.202(e)] | | |
| Did the shipper enter "DOT-E" followed by an exemption number on the shipping paper?. [49 CFR Part 172.203(a)] | | |
| Did the shipper enter the name of the hazardous substance or hazardous waste code in the shipping description when the proper shipping name does not identify the hazardous substance by name?. [49 CFR Part 172.203(c)(1)] | | |
| Did the shipper enter the letters "RQ" on the shipping paper?. [49 CFR Part 172.203(c)(2)] | | |
| Did the shipper enter the technical names of the hazardous materials in the shipping description for n.o.s. or other generic descriptions?. [49 CFR Part 172.203(k)] | | |
| Did the shipper enter the name of the component which makes a material a marine pollutant in the shipping description or enter the words "Marine Pollutant"?. [49 CFR Part 172.203(l)] | | |
| Did the shipper enter the proper information in the shipping description for poisonous materials?. [49 CFR Part 172.203(m)] | | |
| Did the carrier properly prepare a hazardous waste manifest?. [49 CFR Part 172.205(a)] | | |
| Did the shipper (generator) properly prepare a hazardous waste manifest?. [49 CFR Part 172.205(b)] | | |
| Did the shipper (generator) and the intial carrier, date and sign the hazardous waste manifest? . [49 CFR Part 172.205(c)] | | |
| Did each subsequent carrier and the designated facility, date and sign the hazardous waste manifest? . [49 CFR Part 172.205(d)] | | |
| Did the shipper properly mark each package, freight container, or transport vehicle?. [49 CFR Part 172.300(a)] | | |
| Did the carrrier properly mark each package, freight container, or transport vehicle?. [49 CFR Part 172.300(b)] | | |
| Did the shipper mark non-bulk packaging with the proper shipping name and ID#?. [49 CFR Part 172.301(a)(1)] | | |
| Did shipper of a single hazardous material in non-bulk packages in a transport vehicle or freight container mark each side and end with the ID# and each individual package with the same proper shipping name and ID#?. [49 CFR Part 172.301(a)(3)] | | |
| Did the shipper mark non-bulk packaging subject to 172.203 with the technical name of the hazardous material?. [49 CFR Part 172.301(b)] | | |
| Did the shipper mark the outside of a non-bulk package, authorized by an exemption, with DOT-E followed by exemption number?. [49 CFR Part 172.301(c)] | | |
| Did the shipper or carrier properly mark bulk packaging with the ID#?. [49 CFR Part 172.302(a)] | | |
| Did the shipper or carrier display markings of proper size on bulk packagings?. [49 CFR Part 172.302(b)] | | |
| Did the shipper or carrier plainly and durably mark the outside of a bulk package with the terms of an exemption?. [49 CFR Part 172.302(c)] | | |
| Did the shipper or carrier maintain marking on bulk packaging when emptied?. [49 CFR Part 172.302(d)] | | |
| Did the shipper or carrier to comply with fumigation marking requirements?. [49 CFR Part 172.302(g)] | | |
| Did the shipper offer or carrier transport a package that did not contain the hazardous material marked on the package?. [49 CFR Part 172.303(a)] | | |
| Did the shipper or carrier meet the marking requirements?. [49 CFR Part 172.304(a)(1-4)] | | |
| Did the shipper or carrier use only authorized abbreviations?. [49 CFR Part 172.308(a)] | | |
| Did the shipper of non-bulk combination package with inner packagings containing liquid hazardous material pack with closures upward and with package orientation markings?. [49 CFR Part 172.312(a)] | | |
| Did the shipper display arrows for purposes other than to indicate proper package orientation on a non-bulk package containing liquid hazardous material?. [49 CFR Part 172.312(b)] | | |
| Did the shipper or carrier mark packaging containing a material poisonous by inhalation with ?Inhalation Hazard? (marking must be on 2 opposing sides of a bulk packaging)?. [49 CFR Part 172.313(a)] | | |
| Did the shipper or carrier permanently mark non-bulk plastic outer packaging used as a single or composite packaging for Division 6.1 materials with ?POISON? in letters at least 6.3 mm high?. [49 CFR Part 172.313(b)] | | |
| Did the shipper or carrier of a material poisonous by inhalation in non-bulk packages in a transport vehicle or freight container mark each side and end with the ID# and each individual package with the same proper shipping name and ID#?. [49 CFR Part 172.313(c)] | | |
| Did the shipper or carrier mark non-bulk packaging with the ORM-D designation on at least one side or end within a rectangle that is approximately 6.3mm larger on each side than the designation?. [49 CFR Part 172.316(a)] | | |
| Did the shipper or carrier properly mark bulk packaging with the MARINE POLLUTANT mark?. [49 CFR Part 172.322(b)(1-2)] | | |
| Did the shipper or carrier properly mark a transport vehicle or freight container used to transport a package containing a marine pollutant with the MARINE POLLUTANT mark?. [49 CFR Part 172.322(c)] | | |
| Did the shipper or carrier use the proper MARINE POLLUTANT mark?. [49 CFR Part 172.322(e)] | | |
| Did the shipper or carrier comply with the marking requirements for bulk regulated medical waste?. [49 CFR Part 172.323(a-d)] | | |
| Did the shipper mark non-bulk packaging with the name of the hazardous substance or hazardous waste code when not identified by name?. [49 CFR Part 172.324(a)] | | |
| Did the shipper mark the letters ?RQ? on a non-bulk package containing a hazardous substance?. [49 CFR Part 172.324(b)] | | |
| Did the shipper or carrier mark a portable tank on 2 opposing sides with the proper shipping name?. [49 CFR Part 172.326(a)] | | |
| Did the shipper or carrier display the name of the owner or lessee on a portable tank?. [49 CFR Part 172.326(b)] | | |
| Did the shipper or carrier mark a transport vehicle or freight container used to transport a portable tank with ID# if not visible on portable tank?. [49 CFR Part 172.326(c)(1)] | | |
| Did the shipper of a portable tank in a transport vehicle or freight container provide ID# markings to motor carrier if not visible on portable tank?. [49 CFR Part 172.326(c)(2)] | | |
| Did the shipper or carrier provide, affix, or mark the ID# on a cargo tank or on the transport vehicle or freight container if not visible on cargo tank?. [49 CFR Part 172.328(a)(1-3)] | | |
| Did the shipper or carrier provide, affix, or mark the ID# on bulk packaging other than portable tanks or cargo tanks or on the transport vehicle or freight container if not visible on bulk packaging?. [49 CFR Part 172.331(a-c)] | | |
| Did the shipper or carrier properly display ID# on placard?. [49 CFR Part 172.332(c-d)] | | |
| Did anyone display an ID# in a prohibited manner?. [49 CFR Part 172.334(a-g)] | | |
| Did the shipper or carrier, displaying ID#s on transport vehicle or freight container that are not required or prohibited, display proper ID#s?. [49 CFR Part 172.336(a)] | | |
| Did the shipper or carrier properly display ID# on orange panels and/or plain white square-on-point configuration?. [49 CFR Part 172.336(b)] | | |
| Did the carrier replace missing or damaged ID# as soon as practical or to properly enter ID# when done by hand?. [49 CFR Part 172.338] | | |
| Did the shipper or carrier properly label packages or containment devices?. [49 CFR Part 172.400(a-b)] | | |
| Did a shipper or carrier label a package that did not contain a hazardous material or without representing the hazard of the material?. [49 CFR Part 172.401(a)] | | |
| Did a shipper or carrier mark or label a package that could be confused with or conflicts with a label prescribed by 172?. [49 CFR Part 172.401(b)] | | |
| Did the shipper or carrier label packages with primary and subsidiary hazard labels?. [49 CFR Part 172.402(a)(1-2)] | | |
| Did the shipper or carrier display the hazard class or division # in lower corner of primary label?. [49 CFR Part 172.402(b)] | | |
| Did the shipper or carrier use label for each hazard class when hazardous materials having different classes are packed within the same packaging?. [49 CFR Part 172.404(a)] | | |
| Did the shipper or carrier use label for each hazard class when two or more packages containing compatible hazardous material are placed within the same outside container or overpack?. [49 CFR Part 172.404(b)] | | |
| Did the shipper or carrier place label in the proper location on the package or containment device?. [49 CFR Part 172.406(a)(1-2)] | | |
| Did the shipper or carrier place primary and subsidiary hazard labels within 6 inches of one another?. [49 CFR Part 172.406(c)] | | |
| Did the shipper or carrier place label on a background of contrasting color or have a dotted or solid line outer border?. [49 CFR Part 172.406(d)] | | |
| Did the shipper or carrier place duplicate labels on at least 2 sides?. [49 CFR Part 172.406(e)] | | |
| Is the label clearly visible and not obscured by markings or attachments?. [49 CFR Part 172.406(f)] | | |
| Did the shipper or carrier use a durable and weather resistant label?. [49 CFR Part 172.407(a)] | | |
| Did the shipper or carrier use a label design as shown in 172.411-172.448?. [49 CFR Part 172.407(b)] | | |
| Did the shipper or carrier use a label, or numerals or text on a label, of proper size?. [49 CFR Part 172.407(c)(1-5)] | | |
| Did the shipper or carrier use the proper colors on a label?. [49 CFR Part 172.407(d)(1-5)] | | |
| Did the shipper or carrier display prohibited placarding?. [49 CFR Part 172.502(a)(1-2)] | | |
| Did the shipper or carrier, displaying placards that are not required, display proper placards?. [49 CFR Part 172.502(c)] | | |
| Did the shipper or carrier display proper placards?. [49 CFR Part 172.504(a)] | | |
| Did the shipper or carrier use the DANGEROUS placard properly?. [49 CFR Part 172.504(b)] | | |
| Did the shipper or carrier display POISON INHALATION HAZARD or POISON GAS placard, in addition to other placards required?. [49 CFR Part 172.505(a)] | | |
| Did the shipper or carrier display DANGEROUS WHEN WET placard, in addition to other placards required?. [49 CFR Part 172.505(c)] | | |
| Did the shipper provide motor carrier with the required placards prior to or at the same time the material is offered for transportation?. [49 CFR Part 172.506(a)] | | |
| Did the carrier transport hazardous material without proper placarding?. [49 CFR Part 172.506(a)(1)] | | |
| Did the shipper or carrier affix the required placards to a freight container having a capacity of 640 cu.ft?. [49 CFR Part 172.512(a)] | | |
| Did the shipper affix the required placards to a bulk packaging?. [49 CFR Part 172.514(a)] | | |
| Did the shipper or carrier maintain placarding on bulk packaging when emptied?. [49 CFR Part 172.514(b)] | | |
| Was the placard readily visible from the direction it faces?. [49 CFR Part 172.516(a)] | | |
| Did the shipper or carrier meet the placard visibility and display requirements?. [49 CFR Part 172.516(c)(1-6)] | | |
| Did the shipper or carrier ensure that placard holder does not obscure placard surface other than the borders?. [49 CFR Part 172.516(d)] | | |
| Did the shipper or carrier meet the placard strength and durability requirements?. [49 CFR Part 172.519(a)(1-3)] | | |
| Did the shipper or carrier use a placard design as shown in 172.521-172.560?. [49 CFR Part 172.519(b)] | | |
| Did the shipper or carrier use a placard, or numerals or text on a placard, of proper size?. [49 CFR Part 172.519(c)(1-3)] | | |
| Did the shipper or carrier use the proper colors on a placard?. [49 CFR Part 172.519(d)(1-4)] | | |
| Did the shipper or carrier have emergency response information immediately available?. [49 CFR Part 172.600(c)] | | |
| Did the emergency response information contain all required information?. [49 CFR Part 172.602(a)(1-7)] | | |
| Was the emergency response information printed legibly in English, available for use away from the package, or presented on a shipping paper?. [49 CFR Part 172.602(b)] | | |
| Did the carrier properly maintain emergency response information?. [49 CFR Part 172.602(c)(1)] | | |
| Did the facility operator properly maintain emergency response information?. [49 CFR Part 172.602(c)(2)] | | |
| Did the shipper provide a 24-hour emergency response telephone number?. [49 CFR Part 172.604(a)] | | |
| Did the shipper ensure emergency response telephone number is monitored at all times the hazardous material is in transportation?. [49 CFR Part 172.604(a)(1)] | | |
| Did the shipper ensure emergency response telephone number is the number of a person who is either knowledgeable of the hazardous material or has immediate access to a person who possesses such knowledge?. [49 CFR Part 172.604(a)(2)] | | |
| Did the shipper enter the emergency response telephone number on the shipping paper as required?. [49 CFR Part 172.604(a)(3)] | | |
| Was the emergency response telephone number that of the person offering the hazardous material for transportation or of an agency accepting responsibility that has received current information on the material?. [49 CFR Part 172.604(b)] | | |
| Did the carrier instruct the driver to contact the carrier in the event of an incident?. [49 CFR Part 172.606(a)] | | |
| Did the carrier transporting by highway mark transport vehicle with its telephone number when parked at a separate location from its motive power?. [49 CFR Part 172.606(b)(1)] | | |
| Did the carrier transporting by highway have the shipping paper and emergency response information available on the transport vehicle when parked at a separate location from its motive power?. [49 CFR Part 172.606(b)(2)] | | |
| Did the hazmat employer train each of its hazmat employees?. [49 CFR Part 172.702(a)] | | |
| Did the hazmat employer provide training that applies to a particular function before being performed by a hazmat employee?. [49 CFR Part 172.702(b)] | | |
| Did the hazmat employer test each of its hazmat employees by appropriate means on the training subjects?. [49 CFR Part 172.702(d)] | | |
| Did the hazmat employee training include general awareness/familiarization training?. [49 CFR Part 172.704(a)(1)] | | |
| Did the hazmat employee training include function-specific training?. [49 CFR Part 172.704(a)(2)] | | |
| Did the hazmat employee training include safety training?. [49 CFR Part 172.704(a)(3)] | | |
| Did the new hazmat employee, or a hazmat employee who changes job functions, receive initial training?. [49 CFR Part 172.704(c)(1)] | | |
| Did the hazmat employee receive the required training at least once every 3 years?. [49 CFR Part 172.704(c)(2)] | | |
| Did the hazmat employer create and retain a record of current training, inclusive of the preceding 3 years, for 90 days after an employee is no longer employed by that employer as a hazmat employee?. [49 CFR Part 172.704(d)(1-4)] | | |
| Did the shipper class material according to the highest applicable hazard class?. [49 CFR Part 173.2a(a)] | | |
| Did the shipper properly use a salvage drum for packages of hazardous materials that are damaged, defective, or found leaking?. [49 CFR Part 173.3(c)(1-7)] | | |
| Did the shipper comply with packaging requirements for lab packs?. [49 CFR Part 173.12(b)(1-3)] | | |
| Did the shipper properly reuse a packaging for the shipment of hazardous waste?. [49 CFR Part 173.12(c)(1-5)] | | |
| Did the shipper of liquid hazardous material excepted from labeling and placarding requirements comply with packaging requirements?. [49 CFR Part 173.13(c)(1)] | | |
| Did the shipper of solid hazardous material excepted from labeling and placarding requirements comply with packaging requirements?. [49 CFR Part 173.13(c)(2)] | | |
| Did the shipper mark package of hazardous material excepted from labeling and placarding requirements with the statement: ?This package conforms to 49 C.F.R. 173.13??. [49 CFR Part 173.13(d)] | | |
| Did anyone offer for transportation or transport forbidden materials or packages?. [49 CFR Part 173.21(a-k)] | | |
| Did the shipper use a proper packaging or container?. [49 CFR Part 173.22(a)(1-4)] | | |
| Was the shipper, using a packaging authorized under an exemption, the holder of or a party to the exemption?. [49 CFR Part 173.22a(a)] | | |
| Did the shipper maintain a copy of the exemption at each facility where the packaging is being used in connection with the shipment or transportation of the hazardous material?. [49 CFR Part 173.22a(b)] | | |
| Did the shipper furnish a copy of the exemption to the carrier when it contains requirements that apply to the carrier?. [49 CFR Part 173.22a(c)] | | |
| Did the shipper or carrier meet the general requirements for packages?. [49 CFR Part 173.24(b)(1-3)] | | |
| Did the shipper ensure that each package used for the shipment of hazardous materials is designed, constructed, maintained, filled, its contents so limited, and closed, so that under conditions normally incident to transportation there will be no hazardous material residue adhering to the outside of the package during transport?. [49 CFR Part 173.24(b)(4)] | | |
| Did the shipper ensure that the packaging is compatible with its contents?. [49 CFR Part 173.24(e)(1,2,4,5)] | | |
| Did the shipper or carrier use properly designed closures on packagings?. [49 CFR Part 173.24(f)(1-2)] | | |
| Did the shipper or carrier leave sufficient outage when filling packages with liquids?. [49 CFR Part 173.24(h)(1)] | | |
| Did the shipper of non-bulk packagings and packages meet design requirements?. [49 CFR Part 173.24a(a)(1-5)] | | |
| Did the shipper or carrier ensure that no hazardous material remains on the outside of a non-bulk package after filling?. [49 CFR Part 173.24a(b)(5)] | | |
| Did the shipper limit the amount of material placed into a receptacle?. [49 CFR Part 173.24a(d)] | | |
| Did the shipper or carrier load liquids in bulk packagings so that the outage is at least 5% for materials poisonous by inhalation, or at least 1% for all other materials, of the total capacity?. [49 CFR Part 173.24b(a)] | | |
| Did the shipper use a properly prepared overpack?. [49 CFR Part 173.25(a)(1-5)] | | |
| Did the shipper inspect packaging or receptacle before reusing to ensure it conforms to the requirements of 171-180?. [49 CFR Part 173.28(a)] | | |
| Did the shipper properly reuse a non-bulk packaging?. [49 CFR Part 173.28(b)(1-7)] | | |
| Did the shipper reuse a package marked as NRC for material required to be shipped in a DOT specification or UN standard packaging?. [49 CFR Part 173.28(e)] | | |
| Did the shipper comply with disinfecting requirements?. [49 CFR Part 173.28(f)] | | |
| Did anyone offer for transportation or transport empty packaging containing residue of a hazardous material in the same manner as when it previously contained a greater quantity?. [49 CFR Part 173.29(a)] | | |
| Did the shipper or carrier use a portable tank that conforms to the requirements for the particular hazardous material being transported or to retain a manufacturer?s data report while it is used for such service?. [49 CFR Part 173.32(a)(1-3)] | | |
| Did the shipper or carrier follow the requirements for using a special portable tank?. [49 CFR Part 173.32(b)(1-3)] | | |
| Did the shipper or carrier comply with the grandfather provisions for portable tanks?. [49 CFR Part 173.32(c)(1-5)] | | |
| Did the shipper or carrier ensure that the portable tank conforms to the authorized specifications and applicable requirements?. [49 CFR Part 173.32(d)] | | |
| Did the shipper or carrier give the portable tank a complete external inspection prior to use?. [49 CFR Part 173.32(e)(1-5)] | | |
| Did the shipper or carrier ensure that all materials of construction used in a portable tank container and its appurtenances are not subject to destructive attack by its contents?. [49 CFR Part 173.32(f)(1-9)] | | |
| Did the shipper or carrier properly load the portable tank onto the highway?. [49 CFR Part 173.32(g)(1)] | | |
| Did the shipper or carrier ensure that the IM or UN portable tank was not fitted with non-reclosing pressure relief devices except in series with reclosing pressure relief valves?. [49 CFR Part 173.32(g)(2)] | | |
| Did the shipper or carrier use an authorized cargo tank motor vehicle?. [49 CFR Part 173.33(a)(1-3)] | | |
| Did the shipper or carrier meet cargo tank loading requirements?. [49 CFR Part 173.33(b)(1-4)] | | |
| Did the carrier drain piping on DOT specification cargo tanks of any material that is a Division 6.1 material, oxidizer liquid, liquid organic peroxide, or corrosive liquid (skin only) prior to transporting?. [49 CFR Part 173.33(e)] | | |
| Did the shipper or carrier use an authorized intermediate bulk container?. [49 CFR Part 173.35(a)] | | |
| Did the shipper visually inspect each intermediate bulk container and its service equipment before filling?. [49 CFR Part 173.35(b)] | | |
| Did the shipper or carrier filling intermediate bulk container with liquids ensure that it is not filled to more than 98% of its water capacity?. [49 CFR Part 173.35(d)] | | |
| Did the carrier ensure that no hazardous material remains on the outside of the intermediate bulk container during transportation?. [49 CFR Part 173.35(f)(1)] | | |
| Did the carrier ensure that each intermediate bulk container is securely fastened or contained within the transport unit during transportation?. [49 CFR Part 173.35(f)(2)] | | |
| Did the shipper or carrier ensure that each intermediate bulk container of solids is capable of containing the substance in the liquid state?. [49 CFR Part 173.35(g)] | | |
| Did the shipper use only metal, rigid plastic, or composite intermediate bulk containers for liquid hazardous material?. [49 CFR Part 173.35(h)(1-2)] | | |
| Did the shipper or carrier fill an intermediate bulk container with a Packing Group I liquid or exceed the capacity for a Packing Group I solid?. [49 CFR Part 173.35(j)] | | |
| Did the shipper or carrier take measures to prevent an electrostatic discharge during loading and unloading of liquids with a flashpoint of 141oF or lower, or powders with the potential for dust explosion, in intermediate bulk containers?. [49 CFR Part 173.35(k)] | | |
| Did the shipper or carrier comply with the intermediate bulk container filling limits?. [49 CFR Part 173.35(l)(1-4)] | | |
| Did the shipper meet the packaging requirements for regulated medical waste?. [49 CFR Part 173.197(a-e)] | | |
| Did the shipper or carrier meet the general packaging requirements for asbestos?. [49 CFR Part 173.216(c)(1-4)] | | |
| Did the carrier or connecting carrier perform duties, comply with requirements of 177, or ensure its hazmat employees receive training in relation thereto?. [49 CFR Part 177.800(b)] | | |
| Did the carrier train its hazmat employees involved in transportation of hazardous material as required by 177 and subpart H of 172?. [49 CFR Part 177.800(c)] | | |
| Did a carrier cause an unnecessary delay in the shipment of hazardous materials?. [49 CFR Part 177.800(d)] | | |
| Did a carrier transport a forbidden material or hazardous material that was not prepared in accordance with 171-180?. [49 CFR Part 177.801] | | |
| Did the carrier comply with the Federal Motor Carrier Safety regulations?. [49 CFR Part 177.804] | | |
| Did the carrier train driver in the requirements of 49 C.F.R. 390-397?. [49 CFR Part 177.816(a)] | | |
| Did anyone operate a cargo tank or vehicle with portable tank without receiving training or without having the appropriate State-issued commercial driver?s license?. [49 CFR Part 177.816(b)] | | |
| Did the required training conform to the frequency and recordkeeping requirements of 172.704?. [49 CFR Part 177.816(d)] | | |
| Did the carrier transport a hazardous material accompanied by a properly prepared shipping paper?. [49 CFR Part 177.817(a)] | | |
| Did the carrier accept hazardous material for transportation with shipping papers that did not include the required shipper?s certification?. [49 CFR Part 177.817(b)] | | |
| Did the carrier comply with interlining requirements?. [49 CFR Part 177.817(c)] | | |
| Did the carrier ensure that the shipping papers required by 177.817 are available and recognizable by authorities?. [49 CFR Part 177.817(e)] | | |
| Did the carrier mark or placard a vehicle transporting hazardous material?. [49 CFR Part 177.823(a)] | | |
| Did the carrier remove a leaking vehicle from the traveled portion of the highway or employ every available means for safe disposal of the leaking material?. [49 CFR Part 177.823(b)] | | |
| Did the carrier transport a leaking cargo tank more than a minimum distance necessary to reach a site for safe disposal of the contents?. [49 CFR Part 177.823(c)] | | |
| Did the carrier secure packages containing Class 3,2,8,6.1 or 7 material against movement in a motor vehicle, under conditions normally incident to transportation?. [49 CFR Part 177.834(a)] | | |
| Was anyone smoking on or about motor vehicle while loading or unloading Class 1,3,4,5 or Division 2.1?. [49 CFR Part 177.834(c)] | | |
| Was fire kept away or persons from smoking when loading or unloading a Class 1,3,4,5 or Division 2.1 material from a motor vehicle?. [49 CFR Part 177.834(d)] | | |
| Did they securely set the handbrake and prevent motion of the motor vehicle during loading or unloading of hazardous material?. [49 CFR Part 177.834(e)] | | |
| Did anyone use tools that are likely to damage the effectiveness of the closure and adversely affect packages or containers during the loading or unloading of Class 1 material or other dangerous articles?. [49 CFR Part 177.834(f)] | | |
| Did anyone tamper with hazardous material containers or discharged the contents of such containers?. [49 CFR Part 177.834(h)] | | |
| Was the cargo tank attended by a qualified person while it was being loaded?. [49 CFR Part 177.834(i)] | | |
| Did the carrier permit or any person drive a cargo tank containing hazardous material without securely closing the manholes, valves and other closures?. [49 CFR Part 177.834(j)] | | |
| Did anyone load or unload a Class 3 material into or from a cargo tank motor vehicle while the engine was running?. [49 CFR Part 177.837(a)] | | |
| Did the carrier provide metallic bonds or ground conductors for containers which are not in metallic contact with each other for the neutralization of static charges prior to and during transfers of Class 3 materials?. [49 CFR Part 177.837(b)] | | |
| Did the carrier bond and ground cargo tanks before and during transfer of lading when a cargo tank is loaded through an open filling hole?. [49 CFR Part 177.837(c)] | | |
| Did the carrier comply with unloading requirements?. [49 CFR Part 177.837(d)] | | |
| Did the carrier entirely contain Class 4 and 5 materials within the body of the motor vehicle or to cover by tarpaulins or other suitable means?. [49 CFR Part 177.838(a)] | | |
| Did the carrier keep Class 4 and 5 materials dry which are likely to become hazardous when wet when loading a motor vehicle and during transportation?. [49 CFR Part 177.838(b)] | | |
| Did the carrier load articles, possible of spontaneous combustion or heating, with sufficient ventilation to provide assurance against fire?. [49 CFR Part 177.838(c)] | | |
| Did the carrier load Division 4.2 materials in cylinders with valves and safety relief device in the vapor space and in a manner that no shifting occurs in transit?. [49 CFR Part 177.838(h)] | | |
| Did the carrier load nitric acid above any other packaging?. [49 CFR Part 177.839(a)] | | |
| Did the carrier protect batteries containing electrolyte from being impacted by other cargo or protecting their terminals from short circuits?. [49 CFR Part 177.839(b)] | | |
| Did the carrier load bulk arsenical compounds into sift-proof, steel hopper-type, or dump-type motor-vehicle bodies equipped with water-proof, dust-proof covers well secured in place on all openings?. [49 CFR Part 177.841(a)] | | |
| Did the carrier stow or segregate a transport vehicle containing hazardous material in accordance with 176.83(b)?. [49 CFR Part 177.848(b)] | | |
| Did the carrier load or store cyanide or cyanide mixtures with acids?. [49 CFR Part 177.848(c)] | | |
| Did the carrier load, transport, or store hazardous materials in accordance with the Segregation Table for Hazardous Materials?. [49 CFR Part 177.848(d)] | | |
| Did the carrier guard motor vehicle transporting hazardous material and provide against hazards during unnecessary stops on the traveled portion of the highway or shoulder?. [49 CFR Part 177.854(a)] | | |
| Did the carrier use safest practical means afforded when leaks occur in packages or containers during the course of transportation, subsequent to initial loading?. [49 CFR Part 177.854(b)] | | |
| Did the carrier safely and expeditiously store leaking containers of hazardous materials?. [49 CFR Part 177.854(e)] | | |
| Did the carrier set out warning devices when stopped on the highway or shoulder?. [49 CFR Part 177.854(f)] | | |
| Did the carrier use heat or flame to repair fuel or cargo containment system?. [49 CFR Part 177.854(g)] | | |
| Did the carrier repair a cargo tank using a flame or arc before first making it gas free?. [49 CFR Part 177.854(h)] | | |
| Did the carrier use an unauthorized intermediate bulk container for the transportation of a hazardous material?. [49 CFR Part 180.351(a)] | | |
| Did the carrier fill, offer, or transport an intermediate bulk container before the test or inspection was completed?. [49 CFR Part 180.352(a)] | | |
| Did the carrier initially inspect an intermediate bulk container prior to placing hazardous materials into the container?. [49 CFR Part 180.352(c)] | | |
| Did the carrier comply with the repair requirements for intermediate bulk containers?. [49 CFR Part 180.352(d)] | | |
| Did the carrier mark the most recent test date on the intermediate bulk container?. [49 CFR Part 180.352(e)] | | |
| Did the carrier maintain periodic test and inspection records?. [49 CFR Part 180.352(f)] | | |
| Did the carrier use an unauthorized cargo tank?. [49 CFR Part 180.405(a)] | | |
| Did the carrier fill, offer, or transport a cargo tank before tests or inspections were completed?. [49 CFR Part 180.407(a)] | | |
| Did the carrier test or inspect an unsafe, damaged, or out-of-service cargo tank?. [49 CFR Part 180.407(b)] | | |
| Did the carrier mark test and inspection dates on a cargo tank?. [49 CFR Part 180.415(a)] | | |
| Were the cargo tank markings durable and legible?. [49 CFR Part 180.415(b)] | | |
| Did the carrier retain the manufacturer certificate for a cargo tank?. [49 CFR Part 180.417(a)] | | |
| Did the carrier have a written test or inspection report or to retain the written reports for cargo tanks?. [49 CFR Part 180.417(b)] | | |
| Did the carrier use an authorized portable tank for the transportation of hazardous materials?. [49 CFR Part 180.603(a)] | | |
| Did the carrier durably mark DOT 51 portable tank specification plate with appropriate exemption number?. [49 CFR Part 180.603(e)] | | |
| Did the carrier test and inspect any portable tank that has become due prior to returning it for transportation?. [49 CFR Part 180.605(a)] | | |
| Did the carrier comply with the testing and inspection requirements of portable tanks, upon discovery of any of the conditions listed in 49 CFR 180.605?. [49 CFR Part 180.605(b)(1-5)] | | |
| Did the carrier comply with the schedule for periodic inspections and tests of portable tanks?. [49 CFR Part 180.605(c)(1-4)] | | |
| Did the carrier comply with the 2.5 year intermediate periodic inspection and testing schedule for IM and UN portable tanks?. [49 CFR Part 180.605(d)] | | |
| Did the carrier comply with the 5-year periodic inspection and testing requirements 49 CFR 180.605?. [49 CFR Part 180.605(e)] | | |
| Did the carrier comply with the exceptional inspection and testing requirements of 49 CFR 180.605?. [49 CFR Part 180.605(f)] | | |
| Did the carrier comply with the internal and external examination requirements of 49 CFR 180.605?. [49 CFR Part 180.605(g)(1-7)] | | |
| Did the carrier comply with testing and marking requirements for IM and UN portable tanks?. [49 CFR Part 180.605(k)] | | |
| Did the carrier comply with the record retention requirements of 49 CFR 180.605?. [49 CFR Part 180.605(k)(1)] | | |
| Did the carrier obtain minimum levels of financial responsibility?. [49 CFR Part 387.7(a)] | | |
| Did the carrier maintain proof of financial responsibility at principal place of business?. [49 CFR Part 387.7(d)] | | |
| Did the carrier mark a commercial motor vehicle?. [49 CFR Part 390.21(a)] | | |
| Did the carrier display incomplete or incorrect vehicle markings?. [49 CFR Part 390.21(b)] | | |
| Did the carrier use proper size, shape, color, or location of markings?. [49 CFR Part 390.21(c)] | | |
| Did the carrier comply with requirements for location of records or documents?. [49 CFR Part 390.29] | | |
| Did the carrier preserve records and documents in their original form?. [49 CFR Part 390.31(a)] | | |
| Did the carrier permit or require an unqualified person to drive a commercial motor vehicle?. [49 CFR Part 391.11(a)] | | |
| Did the carrier comply with driver qualification requirements?. [49 CFR Part 391.13] | | |
| Did the carrier require a disqualified driver to drive a commercial vehicle?. [49 CFR Part 391.15(a)] | | |
| Did the carrier furnish an employment application?. [49 CFR Part 391.21(b)] | | |
| Did the carrier make required background investigations of a commercial vehicle driver?. [49 CFR Part 391.23(a)] | | |
| Did the carrier make an annual inquiry into all driving records?. [49 CFR Part 391.25(a)] | | |
| Did the carrier make an annual determination that drivers meet minimal requirements?. [49 CFR Part 391.25(b)] | | |
| Did the carrier maintain state agency response to a driving record inquiry?. [49 CFR Part 391.25(c)] | | |
| Did the carrier annually require each driver to furnish a list of all violations?. [49 CFR Part 391.27(a)] | | |
| Did the carrier maintain violation list or certificate in driver?s qualification file?. [49 CFR Part 391.27(d)] | | |
| Did the carrier require a commercial vehicle road test?. [49 CFR Part 391.31(a)] | | |
| Did the carrier provide road test form?. [49 CFR Part 391.31(d)] | | |
| Did the carrier complete a certificate of driver?s road test?. [49 CFR Part 391.31(e)] | | |
| Did the carrier retain original signed road test form or certificate?. [49 CFR Part 391.31(g)] | | |
| Did the person carry a current medical examiner?s certificate?. [49 CFR Part 391.41(a)] | | |
| Did the carrier maintain a driver qualification file?. [49 CFR Part 391.51(a)] | | |
| Did the carrier maintain a complete qualification file?. [49 CFR Part 391.51(b)] | | |
| Did the carrier maintain driver qualification file for 3 years beyond employment?. [49 CFR Part 391.51(c)] | | |
| Did anyone drive a commercial motor vehicle prior to ensuring parts and accessories were in good working order?. [49 CFR Part 392.7(a)] | | |
| Did anyone drive a commercial motor vehicle before being satisfied that the emergency equipment was in place and ready for use?. [49 CFR Part 392.8] | | |
| Was the driver in compliance with 49 C.F.R.392 before operating a commercial motor vehicle?. [49 CFR Part 392.9(a-b)] | | |
| Did the carrier equip a power unit with a properly filled and located fire extinguisher?. [49 CFR Part 393.95(a)] | | |
| Did the carrier equip vehicle with spare fuses?. [49 CFR Part 393.95(c)] | | |
| Did the carrier equip motor vehicle with warning devices for stopped vehicles?. [49 CFR Part 393.95(f)] | | |
| Did the carrier permit or require a driver to drive more than 10 hours or after being on duty for 15 hours?. [49 CFR Part 395.3(a)] | | |
| Did the carrier permit or require a driver to drive for any period after having been on duty 60 hours in 7 consecutive days or after having been on duty 70 hours in 8 consecutive days?. [49 CFR Part 395.3(b)] | | |
| Did the person record duty status?. [49 CFR Part 395.8(a)] | | |
| Did the person record change of duty status?. [49 CFR Part 395.8(c)] | | |
| Did the person record driver?s activities?. [49 CFR Part 395.8(f)] | | |
| Did the person file driver?s record of duty status?. [49 CFR Part 395.8(i)] | | |
| Did the carrier retain records of duty status?. [49 CFR Part 395.8(k)] | | |
| Did the person prepare a written report?. [49 CFR Part 396.11(a)] | | |
| Did the person indicate deficiencies or lack of deficiencies on report or to sign report?. [49 CFR Part 396.11(b)] | | |
| Did the carrier repair deficiencies or to certify or retain inspection reports?. [49 CFR Part 396.11(c)] | | |
| Was the person satisfied that the vehicle is in safe operating condition or to review or sign previous inspection reports?. [49 CFR Part 396.13(a-c)] | | |
| Did the carrier comply with jurisdictional laws concerning driving and parking of hazardous materials vehicles?. [49 CFR Part 397.3] | | |
| Did the carrier attend a vehicle that contains hazardous materials?. [49 CFR Part 397.5] | | |
| Did the carrier park a hazardous material vehicle within 5 feet of the traveled portion of a street or highway?. [49 CFR Part 397.7(b)] | | |
| Did the carrier operat or park a hazardous material vehicle near an open fire?. [49 CFR Part 397.11] | | |
| Did any person smoke within 25 feet of a hazardous material vehicle?. [49 CFR Part 397.13] | | |
| Did the carrier operate a hazardous material vehicle over inappropriate routes?. [49 CFR Part 397.67(b)] | | |
| Did the shipper of a combination packaging containing liquid hazardous materials ensure closures on inner packagings were packed upright?. [49 CFR Part 173.24a(a)(1-5)] | | |
| Did the shipper of paint, paint-related material, adhesives, ink and resins package the waste as follows: 2) In inner glass packagings of not over 1 L (0.3 gallon) capacity each or inner metal packagings of not over 5 L (1 gallon) each, packed in a strong outer packaging? Packages must conform to the packaging requirements of subpart B of this part but need not conform to the requirements of part 178 of this subchapter. [49 CFR Part 173.173(b)(2)] | | |
