| Requirement & Regulatory Citation | Compliance Status | Compliance Comments |
| *GENERATOR REQUIREMENTS | | |
| Did the generator determine if its solid waste is hazardous?. [40 CFR 262.11] | | |
| Did the generator obtain an EPA ID number?. [40 CFR 262.12(a)] | | |
| Did the generator offer hazardous waste only to a transporter or TSD that has an EPA ID number?. [40 CFR 262.12(c)] | | |
| *THE MANIFEST | | |
| Did the generator prepare a manifest before transporting or offering hazardous waste for transport off-site?. [40 CFR 262.20(a)(1)] | | |
| Did the generator properly complete the manifest(s)?. [40 CFR 262.20(a)(1*)] | | |
| Did the generator designate an authorized facility on the manifest?. [40 CFR 262.20(b)] | | |
| Did the generator designate an alternate facility or instruct the transporter to return the waste when the transporter was unable to deliver the waste?. [40 CFR 262.20(d)] | | |
| Did the generator use EPA approved manifest forms for shipments of hazardous waste? [40 CFR 262.21(g)(1)] | | |
| Did the generator determine if generator or consignment state regulates additional wastes or requires the generator to submit copies of the manifest?. [40 CFR 262.21(g)(2)] | | |
| Did the generator sign the manifest?. [40 CFR 262.23(a)(1)] | | |
| Did the generator obtain the signature of the initial transporter and date of acceptance on the manifest?. [40 CFR 262.23(a)(2)] | | |
| Did the generator retain one copy of the manifest in accordance with Sec. 262.40(a)?. [40 CFR 262.23(a)(3)] | | |
| Did the generator supply the transporter with remaining copies of manifest?. [40 CFR 262.23(b)] | | |
| Did the generator shipping hazardous waste within the U.S. solely by water send 3 copies of the manifest form signed and dated to the owner or operator of the designated facility or last water transporter in the U.S.?. [40 CFR 262.23(c)] | | |
| Did the generator send at least 3 copies of the signed and dated manifest for rail shipments of hazardous waste within the U.S. to next non-rail transporter, designated facility, or last rail transporter in the U.S.?. [40 CFR 262.23(d)] | | |
| Did the generator certify to one of the statements in Item 15 of the hazardous waste manifest?. [40 CFR 262.27] | | |
| *PRE-TRANSPORT REQUIREMENTS | | |
| Did the generator package hazardous waste in accordance with 49 C.F.R. Parts 173, 178, and 179?. [40 CFR 262.30] | | |
| Did the generator label each package of hazardous waste in accordance with 49 C.F.R. Part 172? [40 CFR 262.31] | | |
| Did the generator mark packages of hazardous waste in accordance with 49 C.F.R. Part 172? [40 CFR 262.32(a)] | | |
| Did the generator mark each container of hazardous waste with the proper wording or display the wording in accordance with 49 C.F.R. 172.304? [40 CFR 262.32(b)] | | |
| Did the generator placard or offer the appropriate placard for a vehicle containing hazardous waste, in accordance with 49 C.F.R. Part 172, Subpart F? [40 CFR 262.33] | | |
| Did the generator ship waste off site within 90 days? [40 CFR 262.34(a)] | | |
| Did the generator place waste in containers, in tanks, on drip pads, or in containment buildings in accordance with 262.34(a)(1)? [40 CFR 262.34(a)(1)] | | |
| Did the generator clearly mark each container of hazardous waste with the date when the accumulation period began, and make the mark visible for inspection?. [40 CFR 262.34(a)(2)] | | |
| Did the generator clearly mark each container or tank with the words "Hazardous Waste"?. [40 CFR 262.34(a)(3)] | | |
| Did the generator of 1000 kg or greater of hazardous waste ship F006 hazardous waste off site within 180 days?. [40 CFR 262.34(g)] | | |
| Did the generator of 1000 kg or greater of hazardous waste, who transports F006 hazardous waste over 200 miles, ship the F006 hazardous waste off site within 270 days?. [40 CFR 262.34(h)] | | |
| Did the generator properly sign the manifest upon receipt of a returned shipment of hazardous waste?. [40 CFR 262.34(m)] | | |
| *RECORDKEEPING AND REPORTING | | |
| Did the generator keep a copy of each manifest for 3 years? [40 CFR 262.40(a)] | | |
| Did the generator keep a copy of the hazardous waste report or exception report for 3 years? [40 CFR 262.40(b)] | | |
| Did the generator keep records of any test results, waste analyses, or other determinations for 3 years? [40 CFR 262.40(c)] | | |
| Did the generator keep copies of required records during the course of any unresolved enforcement action(s) or as requested by the Department? [40 CFR 262.40(d)] | | |
| Did the generator submit a hazardous waste Biennial Report by March 1 of each even numbered year?. [40 CFR 262.41(a)] | | |
| Did the generator who treats, stores or disposes of hazardous waste on-site submit a hazardous waste report covering those wastes? [40 CFR 262.41(b)] | | |
| Did the generator of greater than 1000 kg of hazardous waste comply with exception reporting requirements? [40 CFR 262.42(a)] | | |
| *STATE ONLY GENERATOR REQUIREMENTS | | |
| Did the facility provide required classroom or on-the-job training for facility personnel?. [40 CFR 265.16(a)(1)] | | |
| Did the facility provide a training program that is directed by a person trained in hazardous waste management procedures?. [40 CFR 265.16(a)(2)] | | |
| Did the facility provide, at a minimum, a training program which is designed to ensure that facility personnel are able to respond effectively to emergencies?. [40 CFR 265.16(a)(3)] | | |
| Did facility personnel successfully complete the training program required in 265.16(a) within 6 months?. [40 CFR 265.16(b)] | | |
| Did facility personnel take part in an annual review of the initial training required in 265.16(a)?. [40 CFR 265.16(c)] | | |
| Did the facility maintain training records at the facility?. [40 CFR 265.16(d)] | | |
| Did the facility keep training records until closure?. [40 CFR 265.16(e)] | | |
| *PREPAREDNESS AND PREVENTION | | |
| Did the facility maintain or operate facility to minimize possibilities of fire, explosion or releases of hazardous waste or hazardous waste constituents?. [40 CFR 265.31] | | |
| Was the facility equipped with emergency equipment?. [40 CFR 265.32] | | |
| Did the facility test and maintain emergency equipment?. [40 CFR 265.33] | | |
| Did the facility maintain access to communications or alarm system?. [40 CFR 265.34] | | |
| Did the facility maintain sufficient aisle space for the unobstructed movement of personnel or equipment in an emergency?. [40 CFR 265.35] | | |
| Did the facility make required arrangements with police or fire departments, emergency response contractors, equipment suppliers, or local hospitals, or document any such authority's refusal of such arrangements?. [40 CFR 265.37] | | |
| *CONTINGENCY PLAN AND EMERGENCY PROCEDURES | | |
| Did the facility have a contingency plan designed to minimize hazards to human health and the environment?. [40 CFR 265.51(a)] | | |
| Did the facility carry out provisions of the plan immediately if there is a fire, explosion, or release?. [40 CFR 265.51(b)] | | |
| Did the contingency plan describe actions to be taken in response to fires, explosions, or release?. [40 CFR 265.52(a)] | | |
| Did the facility amend its SPCC (40 C.F.R. 112 or part 1510 of chapter V) or DPCC (N.J.A.C. 7:1E) Plan to incorporate hazardous waste management provisions?. [40 CFR 265.52(b)] | | |
| Did the contingency plan describe arrangements agreed to by local police or fire departments, hospitals, contractors, or State or local emergency response teams?. [40 CFR 265.52(c)] | | |
| Did the contingency plan list name, addresses, or phone numbers of persons qualified to act as emergency coordinator?. [40 CFR 265.52(d)] | | |
| Did the contingency plan list emergency equipment, updated as required, with its location, description, or capabilities specified?. [40 CFR 265.52(e)] | | |
| Did the contingency plan include evacuation procedure for personnel including signals, evacuation routes or alternate evacuation routes?. [40 CFR 265.52(f)] | | |
| Was the contingency plan maintained at facility with a copy sent to local police or fire departments, hospitals, or State or local emergency response teams?. [40 CFR 265.53] | | |
| Did the facility review or amend contingency plan as necessary?. [40 CFR 265.54] | | |
| Was the emergency coordinator thoroughly familiar with plan or available at all times?. [40 CFR 265.55] | | |
| Did the emergency coordinator identify character, source, amount or areal extent of discharged materials, or activate alarms or communications systems, or notify appropriate State or local agencies if necessary?. [40 CFR 265.56(a-b)] | | |
| Did the emergency coordinator assess possible hazards to human health and the environment?. [40 CFR 265.56(c)] | | |
| Did the emergency coordinator immediately notify appropriate emergency response agency of situation threatening health and the environment?. [40 CFR 265.56(d)] | | |
| Did the emergency coordinator take reasonable measures to ensure hazards are minimized?. [40 CFR 265.56(e)] | | |
| Did the emergency coordinator monitor leaks, pressure buildup, gas generation, or ruptures, if the facility stopped operating due to fire, explosion, or discharge?. [40 CFR 265.56(f)] | | |
| Did the emergency coordinator provide for treating, storing, or disposing of recovered waste, contaminated soil or surface water, or other material?. [40 CFR 265.56(g)] | | |
| Did the emergency coordinator ensure that in affected area of facility no incompatible waste is treated, stored, or disposed of until cleanup procedures are complete or ensure that emergency equipment is cleaned and fit for intended use before operations are resumed?. [40 CFR 265.56(h)] | | |
| Did the facility owner or operator submit a written report to Department within 15 days after an incident?. [40 CFR 265.56(i)] | | |
| *USE AND MANAGEMENT OF CONTAINERS | | |
| Did the facility handle hazardous waste in containers of good condition?. [40 CFR 265.171] | | |
| Did the facility use container compatible with hazardous waste stored?. [40 CFR 265.172] | | |
| Did the facility comply with requirements for the management of containers?. [40 CFR 265.173] | | |
| Did the facility perform inspections, at least weekly, of each area where containers are stored?. [40 CFR 265.174] | | |
| Did the facility store containers holding ignitable or reactive wastes at least 50 feet from property line?. [40 CFR 265.176] | | |
| Did the facility comply with each of the special requirements for incompatible wastes?. [40 CFR 265.177] | | |
| Did the facility comply with 265, Subparts AA, BB, and CC?. [40 CFR 265.178] | | |
| *TANK SYSTEMS | | |
| Did the facility obtain and keep a written assessment by a professional engineer attesting to existing tank system?s integrity?. [40 CFR 265.191(a)] | | |
| Did the written assessment comply with the requirements at 265.191(b)?. [40 CFR 265.191(b)] | | |
| Did the facility assess the integrity of a tank within 12 months of a material becoming a hazardous waste?. [40 CFR 265.191(c)] | | |
| Did the facility have written assessment by a professional engineer attesting that the system has sufficient structural strength?. [40 CFR 265.192(a)] | | |
| Did the facility have a new tank inspected by a qualified installation inspector or engineer for damage prior to covering, enclosing or placing in use?. [40 CFR 265.192(b)] | | |
| Did the facility owner or operator of new tank system or components use appropriate backfill material?. [40 CFR 265.192(c)] | | |
| Did the facility have a new tank and ancillary equipment tested for tightness prior to covering, enclosing or placing in use?. [40 CFR 265.192(d)] | | |
| Did the facility have ancillary equipment supported and protected from settlement, vibration, expansion, or contraction?. [40 CFR 265.192(e)] | | |
| Did the facility provide proper corrosion protection for new tank systems?. [40 CFR 265.192(f)] | | |
| Did the facility obtain and keep on record certifications from those professionals responsible for tank system design and installation?. [40 CFR 265.192(g)] | | |
| Did the facility install secondary containment for hazardous waste tanks within the time frames outlined in 265.193(a)?. [40 CFR 265.193(a)] | | |
| Was the secondary containment system designed, installed, and operated to prevent migration of wastes or accumulated liquid out of system?. [40 CFR 265.193(b)(1)] | | |
| Did the secondary containment system detect and collect releases and accumulated liquids?. [40 CFR 265.193(b)(2)] | | |
| Did the containment system consist of material compatible with wastes stored or have sufficient strength and thickness?. [40 CFR 265.193(c)(1)] | | |
| Did the facility construct secondary containment unit on a base or foundation capable of providing support and resistance to pressure gradients?. [40 CFR 265.193(c)(2)] | | |
| Did the facility construct secondary containment with a leak detection system that is designed and operated to detect the failure of containment structure(s) or the presence of a release?. [40 CFR 265.193(c)(3)] | | |
| Did the facility remove accumulated precipitation or spilled or leaked waste from secondary containment within 24 hours?. [40 CFR 265.193(c)(4)] | | |
| Did the facility provide secondary containment featuring an approved device?. [40 CFR 265.193(d)] | | |
| Did the external liner system meet requirements at 265.193(e)1?. [40 CFR 265.193(e)(1)] | | |
| Did the vault system meet requirements at 265.193(e)2?. [40 CFR 265.193(e)(2)] | | |
| Did the double-walled tank meet requirements at 265.193(e)3?. [40 CFR 265.193(e)(3)] | | |
| Did the facility provide secondary containment for ancillary equipment?. [40 CFR 265.193(f)] | | |
| Did the owner or operator perform an annual leak test on all non-enterable underground tanks that do not have adequate secondary containment?. [40 CFR 265.193(i)(1)] | | |
| Did the owner or operator ensure that either a leak test, internal inspection or integrity test was performed annually on any tank that does not have adequate secondary containment, other than a non-enterable underground tank, and its corresponding ancillary equipment?. [40 CFR 265.193(i)(2)] | | |
| Did the owner or operator maintain on file at the facility a record of the results of the assessments conducted in accordance with 40 C.F.,R. 265.193(i)1 through (i)3?. [40 CFR 265.193(i)(3)] | | |
| Did the facility prevent hazardous wastes or treatment reagents from being placed in tank system if they can cause the tank, its ancillary equipment, or containment system to rupture, leak, corrode, or otherwise fail?. [40 CFR 265.194(a)] | | |
| Did the facility use appropriate controls and practices to prevent spills and overflows from tanks or containment systems?. [40 CFR 265.194(b)] | | |
| Did the owner or operator inspect data gathered from monitoring and leak detection equipment at least once each operating day?. [40 CFR 265.195(a)] | | |
| Did the owner or operator inspect the overfill/spill control equipment, the above ground portions of the tank system and the construction materials and area immediately surrounding the externally accessible portion of the tank system once each operating day?. [40 CFR 265.195(b)] | | |
| Did the owner or operator inspect ancillary equipment that is not provided with secondary containment at least once each operating day?. [40 CFR 265.195(e)] | | |
| Did the facility owner or operator inspect the cathodic protection system according to the schedule found in 40 C.F.R. 265.195(f)? [40 CFR 265.195(f)] | | |
| Did the facility owner or operator document inspections in the facility operating record?. [40 CFR 265.195(g)] | | |
| Did the facility cease using a tank from which a release occurred or which is unfit for use?. [40 CFR 265.196(a)] | | |
| Did the facility remove waste from a tank in which a release occurred within 24 hours in order to affect repairs on the unit?. [40 CFR 265.196(b)] | | |
| Did the facility prevent further migration of the release to soils or water or remove and dispose of any visible contamination of soil or water?. [40 CFR 265.196(c)] | | |
| Did the facility report a release within 24 hours or submit a spill report within 30 days?. [40 CFR 265.196(d)] | | |
| Did the facility comply with 265.196(e)2-4 prior to placing a tank back in service following a release?. [40 CFR 265.196(e)] | | |
| Did the facility obtain a professional engineer?s certification prior to placing a tank back in service following a major repair?. [40 CFR 265.196(f)] | | |
| Did the facility at closure remove or decontaminate all waste residues, contaminated containment system components, contaminated soils, structures, etc?. [40 CFR 265.197(a)] | | |
| Did the facility that has a tank system without secondary containment comply with requirements at 265.197(c)?. [40 CFR 265.197(c)] | | |
| Did the facility meet specific requirements before placing ignitable or reactive waste in a tank?. [40 CFR 265.198(a)] | | |
| Did the facility storing or treating ignitable or reactive wastes in tanks comply with NFPA's buffer zone requirements for tanks?. [40 CFR 265.198(b)] | | |
| Did the facility prevent the placing of incompatible wastes, or wastes and materials, in same tank, except in compliance with 265.17(b)?. [40 CFR 265.199(a)] | | |
| Did the facility prevent the placing of hazardous waste in a tank which is not decontaminated and previously held incompatible waste, except in compliance with 265.17(b)?. [40 CFR 265.199(b)] | | |
| Did the facility utilizing a tank system conduct waste analysis and trial treatment or storage tests before treating/storing different waste or using a different process?. [40 CFR 265.200] | | |
| Did the facility comply with 265, Subparts AA, BB, and CC?. [40 CFR 265.202] | | |
| *LAND DISPOSAL RESTRICTIONS - GENERAL | | |
| Did the generator ensure that a restricted waste is not in any way diluted as a substitute for treatment?. [40 CFR 268.3(a)] | | |
| Did the generator determine if the hazardous waste is restricted from land disposal?. [40 CFR 268.7(a)(1)] | | |
| Did the generator send a one-time written notice with the initial waste shipment to the treatment or storage facility when the waste did not meet the treatment standard or place a copy in the file?. [40 CFR 268.7(a)(2)] | | |
| Did the generator send a one-time written notice and certification with the initial waste shipment to the treatment, storage, or disposal facility when the waste met the treatment standard or place a copy in the file?. [40 CFR 268.7(a)(3)] | | |
| Did the generator of waste exempt from meeting treatment standards send a one-time written notice to the land disposal facility or place a copy in the file before the waste was land disposed?. [40 CFR 268.7(a)(4)] | | |
| Did the generator who is managing and treating prohibited waste develop and follow a written waste analysis plan, and keep plan on site?. [40 CFR 268.7(a)(5)] | | |
| Did the generator retain on site all data used to determine if a waste is restricted?. [40 CFR 268.7(a)(6)] | | |
| Did the generator keep a one-time notice on site stating that he is managing a restricted waste that is excluded from the definition of hazardous or solid waste subsequent to the point of generation and noting the disposition of the waste?. [40 CFR 268.7(a)(7)] | | |
| Did the generator retain documentation required by 268.7 for 3 years or longer during the course of any unresolved enforcement action or as requested by the Department?. [40 CFR 268.7(a)(8)] | | |
| Did the generator using the alternative treatment standards for lab packs send a one-time written notice and certification with the initial waste shipment to the treatment facility or place a copy in the file?. [40 CFR 268.7(a)(9)] | | |
| Did the generators who first claim that hazardous debris is excluded from the definition of hazardous waste meet the proper notification and certification requirements?. [40 CFR 268.7(d)] | | |
| Did the generator of a waste that displays a hazardous characteristic determine the underlying hazardous constituents in the waste?. [40 CFR 268.9(a)] | | |
| Did the generator ensure a prohibited waste exhibiting a characteristic complies with the treatment standards under 268, Subpart D before being land disposed?. [40 CFR 268.9(c)] | | |
| Did the generator of a waste that once exhibited a characteristic, but is no longer hazardous, place a one-time notification and certification in a file or send a copy to the Department?. [40 CFR 268.9(d)] | | |
| *PROHIBITIONS ON LAND DISPOSAL | | |
| Did they comply with the land disposal prohibitions of soils exhibiting the toxicity characteristic for metals and containing PCBs?. [40 CFR 268.32] | | |
| Did they comply with land disposal prohibitions of chlorinated aliphatic wastes?. [40 CFR 268.33] | | |
| Did they comply with the land disposal prohibitions of inorganic chemical wastes?. [40 CFR 268.36] | | |
| *TREATMENT STANDARDS | | |
| Did they meet treatment standard requirements found in the table in 268.40 before land disposing of prohibited waste?. [40 CFR 268.40] | | |
| Did they meet treatment standards before land disposing for hazardous debris?. [40 CFR 268.45] | | |
| Did they meet treatment standards for underlying hazardous constituents?. [40 CFR 268.48] | | |
| Did they meet the alternative LDR treatment standards for contaminated soil?. [40 CFR 268.49] | | |
| Did the facility owner or operator storing restricted waste solely for the purpose of the accumulation of such quantities of waste as necessary to facilitate proper recovery, treatment, or disposal to include the accumulation start date on each container or tank?. [40 CFR 268.50(a)(2)(i-ii)] | | |
